A Comparison of ERP-Success Measurement Approaches

Autores

  • Stephan A. Kronbichler University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology
  • Herwig Ostermann University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology
  • Roland Staudinger University of Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752010000200003

Palavras-chave:

ERP, success, measurement, information system, review

Resumo

ERP projects are complex purposes which influence main internal and external operations of companies. There are different research approaches which try to develop models for IS / ERP success measurement or IT-success measurement in general. Each model has its own area of application and sometimes a specific measurement approach based, for instance, on different systems or different stakeholders involved. This research paper shows some of the most important models developed in the literature and an overview of the different approaches of the models. An analysis which shows the strengths, weaknesses and the cases in which the specific model could be used is made.

Downloads

Publicado

2010-08-26

Como Citar

A. Kronbichler, S., Ostermann, H., & Staudinger, R. (2010). A Comparison of ERP-Success Measurement Approaches. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 7(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752010000200003

Edição

Vol. 7 N.º 2 (2010)

Secção

Articles

Licença

Terms and Conditions The articles are author's responsibility. The publisher allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and to retain publishing rights without restrictions. When submitting an article to JISTEM, authors are responsible for acknowledge and list any conflict of interest and financial support that may have influenced on the research results. Authors are required to sign an official copyright form. CC licensing You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material. The aim of the Directory of Open Access Journals is to increase the visibility and ease of use of open access scientific and scholarly journals thereby promoting their increased usage and impact. The articles have free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles Creative Commons License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Al papers are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Journal's policy of screening for plagiarism: Plagiarism is strictly forbidden, and by submitting the article for publication the authors agree that the publishers have the legal right to take appropriate action against the authors, if plagiarism or fabricated information is discovered.